Regional and temporal patterns of influenza: Application of functional data analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accurate estimation of temporal patterns of influenza may help in utilizing hospital resources and guiding influenza surveillance. This paper proposes functional data analysis (FDA) to improve the prediction of temporal patterns of influenza. METHODS: We illustrate FDA methods using the weekly Influenza-like Illness (ILI) activity level data from the U.S. We propose to use the Fourier basis function for transforming discrete weekly data to the smoothed functional ILI activities. Functional analysis of variance (FANOVA) is used to examine the regional differences in temporal patterns and the impact of state's political orientation. RESULTS: The ILI activity has a very distinct peak at the beginning and end of the year. There are significant differences in average level of ILI activities among geographic regions. However, the temporal patterns in terms of the peak and flat time are quite consistent across regions. The geographic and temporal patterns of ILI activities also depend on the political make-up of states. The states affiliated with Republicans had higher ILI activities than those affiliated with Democrats across the whole year. The influence of political party affiliation on temporal pattern is quite different among geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS: Functional data analysis can help us to reveal the temporal variability in average ILI levels, rate of change in ILI levels, and the effect of geographical regions. Consideration should be given to wider application of FDA to generate more accurate estimates in public health and biomedical research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".