Mobility Load Management in Cellular Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Balancing traffic among cellular networks is very challenging due to many factors. Nevertheless, the explosive growth of mobile data traffic necessitates addressing this problem. Due to the problem complexity, data-driven self-optimized load balancing techniques are leading contenders. In this work, we propose a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning (RL) framework for steering the cell individual offset (CIO) as a means for mobility load management. The state of the LTE network is represented via a subset of key performance indicators (KPIs), all of which are readily available to network operators. We provide a diverse set of reward functions to satisfy the operators' needs. For a small number of cells, we propose using a deep Q-learning technique. We then introduce various enhancements to the vanilla deep Q-learning to reduce bias and generalization errors. Next, we propose the use of actor-critic RL methods, including Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) and twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) schemes, for optimizing CIOs for a large number of cells. We provide extensive simulation results to assess the efficacy of our methods. Our results show substantial improvements in terms of downlink throughput and non-blocked users at the expense of negligible channel quality degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".