MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198686622 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080405

Approximations for the Concentration and Effectiveness Factor in Porous Catalysts of Arbitrary Shape: Taylor Series and Akbari-Ganji’s Methods

2021· article· en· W3198686622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThiele modulusTaylor seriesMichaelis–Menten kineticsSeries (stratigraphy)DiffusionThermodynamicsSubstrate (aquarium)Applied mathematicsMathematicsSimple (philosophy)CatalysisConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysisChemistryPhysicsComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model of reaction-diffusion problem with Michaelis-Menten kinetics in catalyst particles of arbitrary shape is investigated. Analytical expressions of the concentration of substrates are derived as functions of the Thiele modulus, the modified Sherwood number, and the Michaelis constant. A Taylor series approach and the Akbari-Ganji's method are utilized to determine the substrate concentration and the effectiveness factor. The effects of the shape factor on the concentration profiles and the effectiveness factor are discussed. In addition to their simple implementations, the proposed analytical approaches are reliable and highly accurate, as it will be shown when compared with numerical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it