MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199144297 · doi:10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.2i

Preface

2006· article· en· W3199144297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications on Pure &amp Applied Analysis · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Library scienceComputer scienceOperations researchMathematics educationApplied mathematicsPolitical scienceMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decades there have been very rapid developments of analysis and numerical approximations for singular problems. To review the recent developments and to explore exciting new directions in this area, the International Workshop on Analysis and Numerical Approximation of Singular Problems was held at Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal, from 10-12 November 2004. The aim of this workshop was to bring together active scientists working on singular problems in physics and engineering, and to provide a forum so that they would meet and exchange ideas in a stimulating environment. The conference was attended by more than forty participants from over ten countries, including 14 invited talks, 13 contributed talks and a poster session. The detailed information of the workshop can be found in http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~plima/IWAN. <br><br> For more information please click the “Full Text” above.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it