A machine learning approach for spatiotemporal imputation of MODIS chlorophyll-a
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) level-3 chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) product is one of the widely used ocean colour products that is often used for water quality monitoring of marine ecosystems. However, this product includes a large amount of missing data due to high surface reflectance and cloudy conditions that inevitably affect its suitability for spatiotemporal analysis of water quality. The objective of this study was to compare four Machine Learning (ML) techniques including K-nearest neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with well-known Data Interpolation Empirical Orthogonal Function (DINEOF) method for spatiotemporal missing imputation of MODIS Chl-a. The Southern Caspian Sea, which has a high Chl-a concentration, was selected as the case study. A cross-validation approach ranging missing data ratio from 0.1 to 0.8 was implemented to investigate the optimal parameters of the models and compare their performance for missing imputation. The results indicated that all ML models, except KNN, outperformed the DINEOF method for missing imputation of MODIS Chl-a. The SVR with the highest accuracy and the lowest variability of errors had the best performance among the five competing models, while the KNN showed the worst performance. The main reason for the better accuracy of the SVR than the other models is its structural risk minimization procedure that leads to the better generalization of the SVR model. The current results showed that the ML techniques used in the current study, the SVR in particular, are able to produce reliable imputations of the MODIS Chl-a missing data and can be a useful tool in water quality monitoring of marine ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".