RPL properties of samarium-doped CaSO <sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Radiophotoluminescence (RPL) properties of Sm-doped CaSO 4 for radiation dosimetry applications are reported. The samples with varying Sm concentrations are prepared via the solid-state reaction process. The as-prepared samples show photoluminescence due to typical 4f–f transitions of Sm 3+ whereas, after X-ray irradiation, additional emission features appear with a broad band peaking at 630 nm as well as a set of multiple sharp lines across 680–820 nm, which are attributed to the 5d–4f and 4f–4f transitions of Sm 2+ , respectively. Therefore, the RPL in the present material system relies on the generation of Sm 2+ centers. The sensitivity is about 3 times lower than that of Ag-doped phosphate glass, but no fading and build-up of signal are evident even immediately after the irradiation. The signal is reversible by heat-treatment at 500 °C, and is reproducible even after the thermal erasure, especially when the differential signal between pre- and post-irradiation is taken into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".