MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200171937 · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ac1ab2

RPL properties of samarium-doped CaSO <sub>4</sub>

2021· article· en· W3200171937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSamariumIrradiationPhotoluminescenceDopingMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)DosimeterSIGNAL (programming language)DosimetryRadiationNuclear chemistryRadiochemistryOptoelectronicsChemistryOpticsPhysicsInorganic chemistryNuclear medicineNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Radiophotoluminescence (RPL) properties of Sm-doped CaSO 4 for radiation dosimetry applications are reported. The samples with varying Sm concentrations are prepared via the solid-state reaction process. The as-prepared samples show photoluminescence due to typical 4f–f transitions of Sm 3+ whereas, after X-ray irradiation, additional emission features appear with a broad band peaking at 630 nm as well as a set of multiple sharp lines across 680–820 nm, which are attributed to the 5d–4f and 4f–4f transitions of Sm 2+ , respectively. Therefore, the RPL in the present material system relies on the generation of Sm 2+ centers. The sensitivity is about 3 times lower than that of Ag-doped phosphate glass, but no fading and build-up of signal are evident even immediately after the irradiation. The signal is reversible by heat-treatment at 500 °C, and is reproducible even after the thermal erasure, especially when the differential signal between pre- and post-irradiation is taken into account.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it