Height Control and Optimal Torque Planning for Jumping With Wheeled-Bipedal Robots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper mainly studies the accurate height jumping control of wheeled-bipedal robots based on torque planning and energy consumption optimization. Due to the characteristics of underactuated, nonlinear estimation, and instantaneous impact in the jumping process, accurate control of the wheeled-bipedal robot’s jumping height is complicated. In reality, robots often jump at excessive height to ensure safety, causing additional motor loss, greater ground reaction force and more energy consumption. To solve this problem, a novel wheeled-bipedal jumping dynamical model(W-JBD) is proposed to achieve accurate height control. It performs well but not suitable for the real robot because the torque has a striking step. Therefore, the Bayesian optimization for torque planning method(BOTP) is proposed, which can obtain the optimal torque planning without accurate dynamic model and within few iterations. BOTP method can reduce 82.3% height error, 26.9% energy cost with continuous torque curve. This result is validated in the Webots simulation platform. Based on the torque curve obtained in the W-JBD model to narrow the searching space, BOTP can quickly converge (40 times on average). Cooperating W-JBD model and BOTP method, it is possible to achieve the height control of real robots with reasonable times of experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it