Robust Visual Teach and Repeat for UGVs Using 3D Semantic Maps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a Visual Teach and Repeat (VTR) algorithm using semantic landmarks extracted from environmental objects for ground robots with fixed mount monocular cameras. The proposed algorithm is robust to changes in the starting pose of the camera/robot, where a pose is defined as the planar position plus the orientation around the vertical axis. VTR consists of a teach phase in which a robot moves in a prescribed path, and a repeat phase in which the robot tries to repeat the same path starting from the same or a different pose. Most available VTR algorithms are pose dependent and cannot perform well in the repeat phase when starting from an initial pose far from that of the teach phase. To achieve more robust pose independency, the key is to generate a 3D semantic map of the environment containing the camera trajectory and the positions of surrounding objects during the teach phase. For specific implementation, we use ORB-SLAM to collect the camera poses and the 3D point clouds of the environment, and YOLOv3 to detect objects in the environment. We then combine the two outputs to build the semantic map. In the repeat phase, we relocalize the robot based on the detected objects and the stored semantic map. The robot is then able to move toward the teach path, and repeat it in both forward and backward directions. We have tested the proposed algorithm in different scenarios and compared it with two most relevant recent studies. Also, we compared our algorithm with two image-based relocalization methods. One is purely based on ORB-SLAM and the other combines Superglue and RANSAC. The results show that our algorithm is much more robust with respect to pose variations as well as environmental alterations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".