MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative Study on Quantization-Aware Training of Memristor Crossbars for Reducing Inference Power of Neural Networks at The Edge

2021· article· en· W3201645160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNeurosciences Research Foundation
KeywordsCrossbar switchComputer scienceMemristorConvolutional neural networkEdge computingQuantization (signal processing)InferenceEdge deviceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceKernel (algebra)Cloud computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer architectureAlgorithmElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Internet-of- Things (IoT) technology is spreading widely in human life, a massive number of IoT sensors and edge devices generate huge amounts of unstructured data everywhere and every time. To mitigate the energy burden of computation and communication for processing these huge data at the cloud servers, edge intelligence becomes essential in IoT sensors. In this paper, for implementing edge intelligence in IoT sensors, a comparative study on the training of memristor crossbars is carried out for reducing the crossbar's inference power at the edge. For understanding the relationship of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture and crossbar's power consumption, memristor-crossbar CNNs with different synapse types, different kernel sizes, and different percentages of Low Resistance State (LRS) cells in the crossbar are compared and analyzed in this paper. After the comparative study, ternary synapse, small kernel size, and reduced number of active bits can be suggested for achieving a higher recognition rate and lower crossbar's power consumption than the other memristor-crossbar CNNs. Adjusting the percentage of LRS cells in the crossbar indicates that the recognition rate begins to fall sharply when the percentage of LRS cells becomes less than 10% of the total memristor cells, for Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) and Canadian Institute For Advanced Research (CIFAR-10) datasets. To minimize the recognition rate loss due to the reduction of active bits, the quantization-aware training of memristor crossbars is combined with the optimization of crossbar's inference power. Here the training with weight quantization can be repeated to minimize the recognition rate loss until the inference power consumption of memristor-crossbar CNN reaches a target inference power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207