MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202627678 · doi:10.1080/15228053.2021.1980848

Online education next wave: peer to peer learning

2021· article· en· W3202627678 on OpenAlexaff
Shailendra Palvia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsMinnow Environmental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsynchronous communicationHigher educationOnline learningMathematics educationPhenomenonPeer feedbackComputer scienceSynchronous learningAsynchronous learningCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Mode (computer interface)Peer tutorPedagogyKnowledge managementPsychologyCooperative learningMultimediaPolitical scienceTeaching methodTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Online education is no longer a trend; it is slowly but surely becoming a norm. It has become a global phenomenon driven by the onslaught of coronavirus pandemic, emergence of new learning platforms, and wide acceptance of teaching and learning in online synchronous and asynchronous modes by diverse stakeholders. Current online education technologies and platforms emphasize interactions between professors and students. Through the holistic model of online education, we emphasize in this article student-to-student (peer-to-peer) learning in the online mode similar to what exists in the traditional F2F mode. The evolving student-to-student interactional SolveitNow model at present covers tertiary education students. With requisite changes, it can be easily applicable to secondary and primary education students. SolveItNow is currently in beta testing on a large scale at multiple levels of Mathematics education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information Technology Case and Application ResearchSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207