MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202684658 · doi:10.15439/2021f91

Design and application of facial expression analysis system in empathy ability of children with autism spectrum disorder

2021· article· en· W3202684658 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Guo, Kun Zhang, Jingying Chen, Ruyi Xu, Lei Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Computer Science and Information Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyAutism spectrum disorderFacial expressionAutismPsychologyExpression (computer science)Facial expression recognitionDevelopmental psychologyIntervention (counseling)Cognitive psychologyFacial recognition systemComputer scienceSocial psychologyCommunicationPsychiatryPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empathy is an important social ability in the early childhood development. One of the significant characteristics of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is their lack of empathy, which makes it difficult for them to feel and understand other people's emotions and to judge other people's behavioral intentions, leading to social disorders. This research designs and implements a facial expression analysis system that could obtain and analyze the real-time facial expressions of children when viewing stimulus materials, and then evaluate the differences of empathy ability between ASD children and typical development (TD) children. The results of this research provide new ideas for the evaluation of ASD children, and also help to develop empathy intervention plans for ASD children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Computer Science and Information SystemsSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207