MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203317328 · doi:10.51594/ijmer.v3i8.253

THE CONCEPT OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: DEFINITIONS IN A CONTEMPORARY MARKETING PERSPECTIVE

2021· article· en· W3203317328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHalal products and consumer behavior
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Interpretation (philosophy)Consumer behaviourIdentification (biology)Consumption (sociology)Context (archaeology)PerceptionQualitative marketing researchMarketingSociologyEpistemologyPsychologyAdvertisingMarketing researchSocial psychologyQuantitative marketing researchComputer scienceSocial scienceBusinessGeographyReturn on marketing investmentArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There have been some multiple understandings and considerations of the concept of consumer behavior, however little is known about the concept in this contemporary area. This research purpose is to explore the concept of consumer behavior under different aspects of its interpretation. The approach is based on a sound documentary analysis, with some direct and indirect observations. It consists of a sound search for relevant literature, followed by the evaluation of sources, an identification of themes, and gaps. The results show that there are some similarities but also some differences in the definition of the concept following the research context. As such, there is not a quite common definition of this concept. However, a common conception of consumer behavior refers to the particular perceptions of habits, lifestyles, attitude and practices. Keywords: Consumer behavior, Consumption, Africa, Marketing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it