Modeling Real-Time Application Processor Scheduling for Fog Computing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model for fog computing by considering the processing nodes of both edge and cloud devices for real-time applications. We use mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) mathematical model to find the optimal task scheduling and compare it with the performance of the FIFO online scheduling strategies for a fog computing sample that consists of n edge processors (EP) and one cloud processor. The MILP mathematical dispatching strategy optimizes the jobs' scheduling on the EPs and cloud processors. Finally, solving the model and simulation of more scenarios is presented to compare the performance of the optimized job scheduling model with two FIFO scenarios for a real-time application on fog computing. The results show that the FIFO process scheduling strategy's performance is between 62.71% to 95.10% of the optimal jobs' scheduling proposed in this work for the real-time fog computing-based applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it