Hybrid Group Anomaly Detection for Sequence Data: Application to Trajectory Data Analytics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many research areas depend on group anomaly detection. The use of group anomaly detection can maintain and provide security and privacy to the data involved. This research attempts to solve the deficiency of the existing literature in outlier detection thus a novel hybrid framework to identify group anomaly detection from sequence data is proposed in this paper. It proposes two approaches for efficiently solving this problem: i)Hybrid Data Mining-based algorithm, consists of three main phases: first, the clustering algorithm is applied to derive the micro-clusters. Second, the$kNN$algorithm is applied to each micro-cluster to calculate the candidates of the group’s outliers. Third, a pattern mining framework gets applied to the candidates of the group’s outliers as a pruning strategy, to generate the groups of outliers, and ii) aGPU-basedapproach is presented, which benefits from the massively GPU computing to boost the runtime of the hybrid data mining-based algorithm. Extensive experiments were conducted to show the advantages of different sequence databases of our proposed model. Results clearly show the efficiency of a GPU direction when directly compared to a sequential approach by reaching a speedup of451. In addition, both approaches outperform the baseline methods for group detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".