Multilevel Clustering-Evolutionary Random Support Vector Machine Cluster Algorithm-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Cerebral Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was to explore the value of the blood oxygenation level dependent-functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI) image classification based on the multilevel clustering-evolutionary random support vector machine cluster (MCRSVMC) algorithm in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cognitive impairment after cerebral ischemic stroke (CIS). The MCRSVMC algorithm was optimized using a clustering algorithm, and it was compared with other algorithms in terms of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) of classifying the brain area images. 36 patients with cognitive impairment after CIS and nondementia patients were divided into a control group (drug treatment) and an intervention group (drug + acupuncture) according to different treatment methods, with 18 cases in each group. The changes in regional homogeneity (ReHo) of BOLD-fMRI images and the differences in scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), scores of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA), and scores of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) between the two groups of patients were compared before and after treatment. The results revealed that the average classification ACC, SEN, and SPE of the MCRSVMC algorithm were 84.25 ± 4.13%, 91.07 ± 3.51%, and 89 ± 3.96%, respectively, which were all obviously better than those of other algorithms ( P < 0.01 ). When the number of support vector machine (SVM) classifiers and the number of important features were 410 and 260, respectively, the classification ACC of MCRSVMC algorithm was 0.9429 and 0.9092, respectively. After treatment, the MoCA score, LOTCA score, and FIM score of the patients in the intervention group were higher than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The ReHo values of the right inferior temporal gyrus and right inferior frontal gyrus of patients in the intervention group were much higher than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). It indicated that the classification ACC, SEN, and SPE of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on the MCRSVMC algorithm in this study were greatly improved, and the acupuncture method was more effective in the treatment of patients with cognitive dysfunction after CIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".