MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205087287 · doi:10.25959/100.00037833

Machine learning for mineral exploration: prediction and quantified uncertainty at multiple exploration stages

2021· dissertation· en· W3205087287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUTAS Research Repository · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineral explorationVariety (cybernetics)Context (archaeology)GeologistMachine learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGround truthData miningData scienceGeologyGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning describes an array of computational and nested statistical methods whereby a computer can 'learn' and subsequently make predictions or identify patterns in data. With the increasing volume and variety of numerical data in the geosciences, and widespread availability of the needed computing power, machine learning techniques are a logical addition to the numerous possible approaches that can be applied to the search for ore deposits. The three core research chapters in this thesis develop the application of machine learning in the context of mineral exploration. Emphasis is placed on the Random Forests algorithm for mapping lithology in a range of settings and at a variety of stages in the exploration process. Information entropy is used to assist both in assessing and communicating any complex combinations, and potential inaccuracy, of classification results. Through the thesis, methods are employed with future practical usage in mind, such that machine learning may be used by the geologist (as domain expert) in an objective manner. The first of these core studies uses the Random Forests algorithm to re-classify the solid geology lithology map of the Heron South project, located in the Eastern Goldfields ofWestern Australia. This study uses geophysical and remote sensing data, in the absence of geochemical samples and geological ground truthing with most of the project under transported cover. This is characteristic of an early stage, reconnaissance exploration project. A sparse training sample of 1.6 percent of the total area, is taken as training data, allowing much of the areas geology the freedom to be reclassified. This study demonstrates that Random Forests, with proper consideration given to sampling and training data selection, can be used effectively to produce or improve geological mapping in little-explored areas. Information entropy is shown to be valuable in predicting where classification was likely to be inaccurate or a region highly complex. The second core study uses Random Forests to produce a solid geology map of the Kliyul porphyry prospect of British Columbia, Canada, using a fusion of available geophysical and geochemical data, typical of a greenfields stage exploration project. Soil and rock chip sample sites were taken as training data, used to classify the remainder of the project area. Assessment of the probability distributions produced using the Random Forests algorithm enabled regions with an elevated probabilityof intrusions (a key indicator lithology) to be mapped, even where not observed in training data. The results of this study highlight the value of a soft, ensemble classifier such as Random Forests, and the value to be gained from an assessment of the spatial distribution of class probabilities as opposed to viewing a final map as a solution in isolation. In the third and final core study, a range of training data sampling paradigms are tested in a data rich area located in the Domes region of the Central African Copper belt hosting the Sentinel (Ni) and Enterprise (Cu) deposits. This study simulates early and advanced stage exploration project maturity in incorporating a priori geological Information. It culminates in the use of Random Forests to undertake an objective audit of the present company geological map. Further to this, unsupervised clustering is used in the production of a geological map in the absence of training or constraint through identifying the natural grouping of data. The results of these studies highlight the importance of proper sample balancing and explore the repercussions of limited and/or non-representative training data. The use of the information entropy proxy is developed to identify where a classification may depart from the domain represented by training data. The ranking of input data that is performed in association with the Random Forests classification can be used to improve clustering results through optimising dataset selection. Through the three core research chapters, a set of practical considerations and recommendations for explorers are provided. It is demonstrated that Random Forests can provide an objective audit and subsequent refinement of a pre-existing geological map. The expression of uncertainty using information entropy, and the assessment of class probabilities, can be used to appraise the results from the machine learning analyses. This includes validation in the case of complex outcome combinations, and generation of new insights. Ranking of input datasets via Random Forests can enhance understanding of data and improve both Random Forests classification results and improve clustering. With the proper selection of appropriate datasets, clustering (for example immobile trace elements) and scaling can indeed produce results that correspond well with lithology. Studies presented in this thesis use data from current/active exploration projects and methods are distilled to streamlined workflows using industry standard software and data formats. In summary, these methods, previously the domain of computer and data scientists, are now developed to be more widely accessible to mineral explorers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it