MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3205202531 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a77

Pseudoexfoliation and Alzheimer's associated CLU risk variant, rs2279590 lies within an enhancer element and regulates CLU, EPHX2 and PTK2B gene expression

2017· article· en· W3205202531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClusterin in disease pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhancerGeneGeneticsBiologyGene expressionExpression (computer science)MedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) is an age related ocular disorder characterized by deposition of protein aggregates on the surface of anterior eye tissues. Advanced stage of PEX is called as pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) which leads to gradual degeneration of optic nerve and loss of vision compared to that of less severe stage called pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS). PEXG is the leading contributor of secondary glaucoma worldwide. It shares similar pathological alterations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) with characteristic deposition of fibrilar protein aggregates and gradual deterioration of nerves with age. Studies done in the past suggest a prominent genetic factor underlying the pathogenesis of PEX. Here, we examined the role of two genetic variants (rs3087554 and rs2279590) within the gene clusterin (CLU) as risk factor in the pathogenesis of PEX by performing a case-control study in Indian population. Through, bidirectional sequencing and genetic analysis, both of the variants were found to be significantly associated with PEX. Further functional analysis was carried out for the 7th intronic SNP rs2279590 which previously has been picked as a risk factor for AD. In silico analysis suggests rs2279590 resides in an active regulatory region and is an eQTL for CLU gene expression from the data in ENCODE and GTEx project, respectively. Alleles at rs2279590 were shown to differentially regulate CLU expression in lens capsule tissues. Reporter assays show that rs2279590 is within an active enhancer element and 3C assays reveal a promoter-enhancer interaction mediated by CLU promoter and rs2279590 loci. Deletion of 115bp region flanking the rs2279590 variant through CRISPR-Cas9 demonstrated a decreased CLU expression. Molecular assays show that rs2279590 with allele “A” constitutes a transcription factor binding site for heat shock factor-1 (HSF1) but not with allele “G”. After binding, HSF1 abrogates the enhancer effect of the locus as validated by reporter assays. Interestingly, rs2279590 locus also has a widespread enhancer effect on two nearby genes, PTK2B and EPHX2; both of which are risk factors for AD. Together, our study unveils a mechanistic role of the common variant rs2279590 that can affect both PEX and AD by regulating the expression of a specific set of genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it