Local invertibility and sensitivity of atomic structure-feature mappings [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The increasingly common applications of machine-learning schemes to atomic-scale simulations have triggered efforts to better understand the mathematical properties of the mapping between the Cartesian coordinates of the atoms and the variety of representations that can be used to convert them into a finite set of symmetric descriptors or features. Methods: Here, we analyze the sensitivity of the mapping to atomic displacements, using a singular value decomposition of the Jacobian of the transformation to quantify the sensitivity for different configurations, choice of representations and implementation details. Results: We show that the combination of symmetry and smoothness leads to mappings that have singular points at which the Jacobian has one or more null singular values (besides those corresponding to infinitesimal translations and rotations). This is in fact desirable, because it enforces physical symmetry constraints on the values predicted by regression models constructed using such representations. However, besides these symmetry-induced singularities, there are also spurious singular points, that we find to be linked to the incompleteness of the mapping, i.e. the fact that, for certain classes of representations, structurally distinct configurations are not guaranteed to be mapped onto different feature vectors. Additional singularities can be introduced by a too aggressive truncation of the infinite basis set that is used to discretize the representations. Conclusions: These results exemplify the subtle issues that arise when constructing symmetric representations of atomic structures, and provide conceptual and numerical tools to identify and investigate them in both benchmark and realistic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it