Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interlanguage theory analyzes the temporary linguistic system that target language (TL) learners develop to express meanings in the TL. A major limitation of this theory is that it claims that only five percent of adult second language (L2) learners achieve full competence. Another limitation is that it compares bilingual speakers with monolingual ones. In spite of these limitations, understanding the cognitive processes of interlanguage: language transfer , transfer of training , strategies of L2 learning , communication strategies , and overgeneralization of L2 rules , as well as its characteristics: permeability , dynamic nature , systematicity , stability , mutual intelligibility , backsliding , and variability , benefits L2 teachers and learners. Recent research challenges the monolingual bias in second language acquisition (SLA) and emphasizes that the interlanguage of most L2 learners is dynamic and not fossilized. There is no critical period for learning syntax, because some adult learners achieve full grammatical mastery of the TL if they receive appropriate grammatical instruction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it