MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208539921 · doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3123500

User Access Control in Open Radio Access Networks: A Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

2021· article· en· W3208539921 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesProject 211National Key Research and Development Program of ChinaMinistry of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningC-RANComputer networkSoftware deploymentUser equipmentScheme (mathematics)Base stationInteroperabilityRadio access networkThroughputDistributed computingWirelessArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Targeting at implementing the next generation radio access networks (RANs) with virtualized network components, the open RAN (O-RAN) has been regarded as a novel paradigm towards fully open, virtualized and interoperable RANs. Through particularly introducing RAN intelligent controllers (RICs), machine learning (ML) can be unprecedentedly installed, adapting to various vertical applications and deployment environments without sophisticated planning efforts. However, the O-RAN also suffers two critical challenges of load balancing and frequent handovers in the massive base station (BS) deployment. In this paper, an intelligent user access control scheme with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is proposed. To optimize the performance of distributed deep Q-networks (DQNs) trained by user equipments (UEs), a federated DRL-based scheme is proposed with a global model server installed in the RIC to update the DQN parameters. To further predictively train a global DQN with acceptable signaling overheads, the upper confidence bound (UCB) algorithm to select the optimal UE set and a dueling structure to decompose the DQN parameters are developed. With the proposed scheme, each UE effectively maximizes the long-term throughput and avoids frequent handovers. The simulation results well justify the outstanding performance of the proposed scheme over the-state-of-the-arts, to serve as references for the O-RAN standardization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it