MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208582465 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.11074

A Unified Framework for Regularized Estimating Equations via Fixed-Point and Variational Inequality Problems

2021· preprint· en· W3208582465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematicsOperator (biology)Point (geometry)Variational inequalityFixed pointEstimating equationsRegularization (linguistics)Generalized estimating equationMathematical optimizationCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceMaximum likelihoodStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many statistics problems are formulated within an estimating equation framework instead of a minimization framework. However, the regularized estimating equations (REE) have been much less extensively studies than regularized minimization problems. In this paper, we study an improved regularized estimating equation formulation and explore its subsequent equivalences in terms of (1) fixed-point problem specified via the proximal operator of the corresponding regularizer, and (2) generalized variational inequality problems. Such equivalences hold under general conditions and accommodate nonconvex regularizers. Moreover, these equivalences open up new possibilities in theoretical analysis and computational algorithms when studying the REE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.048 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it