MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210267130 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2021.3122468

Performance Analysis of RIS-Aided Networks With Co-Channel Interference

2021· article· en· W3210267130 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInterference (communication)Computer scienceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Bit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Signal-to-interference ratioIndependent and identically distributed random variablesOutage probabilityCo-channel interferenceInterference alignmentAlgorithmElectronic engineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematicsRandom variableFadingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we investigate the performance of reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided networks in the presence of non-identically distributed interferers at the destination. A mathematical framework is proposed to statistically characterize the cascaded channels and to evaluate the performance in terms of outage probability (OP) and average bit error rate (BER). The high signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) analysis reduces to easy-to-compute expressions for the outage probability and BER, which reveals inside information for the system design. We also extend the analysis to study multi-RIS networks with two schemes. Representative results show that the RIS element number and interference setting have a significant impact on the overall system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it