Error propagation dynamics of velocimetry-based pressure field calculations (2): on the error profile
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A recent study investigated the propagation of error in a velocimetry-based pressure (V-pressure) field reconstruction problem by directly analyzing the properties of the pressure Poisson equation (Pan et al 2016 Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 084012). In the present work, we extend these results by quantifying the effect of the error profile in the data field (shape/structure of the error in space) on the resultant error in the reconstructed pressure field. We first calculate the mode of the error in the data that maximizes error in the pressure field, which is the most dangerous error (called the worst error in the present work). This calculation of the worst error is equivalent to finding the principle mode of, for example, an Euler–Bernoulli beam problem in one-dimension and the Kirchhoff–Love plate in two-dimensions, thus connecting the V-pressure problem from experimental fluid mechanics to buckling elastic bodies from elastic mechanics. Taking advantage of this analogy, we then analyze how the error profile (e.g. spatial frequency of the error and the location of the most concentrated error) in the data field coupled with fundamental features of the flow domain (i.e. size, shape, and dimension of the domain, and the configuration of boundary conditions) significantly affects the error propagation from data to the reconstructed pressure. Our analytical results lend to practical applications in two ways. First, minimization of error propagation can be achieved by avoiding low frequency error profiles in data similar to the worst case scenarios and error concentrated at sensitive locations. Second, small amounts of the error in the data, if the error profile is similar to the worst error case, can cause significant error in the reconstructed pressure field; such a synthetic error can be used to benchmark V-pressure algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it