A Hybrid Technique Based on a Genetic Algorithm for Fuzzy Multiobjective Problems in 5G, Internet of Things, and Mobile Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging commucation technologies, such as mobile edge computing (MEC), Internet of Things (IoT), and fifth-generation (5G) broadband cellular networks, have recently drawn a great deal of interest. Therefore, numerous multiobjective optimization problems (MOOP) associated with the aforementioned technologies have arisen, for example, energy consumption, cost-effective edge user allocation (EUA), and efficient scheduling. Accordingly, the formularization of these problems through fuzzy relation equations (FRE) should be taken into consideration as a capable approach to achieving an optimized solution. In this paper, a modified technique based on a genetic algorithm (GA) to solve MOOPs, which are formulated by fuzzy relation constraints with s -norm, is proposed. In this method, firstly, some techniques are utilized to reduce the size of the problem, so that the reduced problem can be solved easily. The proposed GA-based technique is then applied to solve the reduced problem locally. The most important advantage of this method is to solve a wide variety of MOOPs in the field of IoT, EC, and 5G. Furthermore, some numerical experiments are conducted to show the capability of the proposed technique. Not only does this method overcome the weaknesses of conventional methods owing to its potentials in the nonconvex feasible domain, but it also is useful to model complex systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".