MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210489622 · doi:10.1155/2021/9194578

A Hybrid Technique Based on a Genetic Algorithm for Fuzzy Multiobjective Problems in 5G, Internet of Things, and Mobile Edge Computing

2021· article· en· W3210489622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersResearch Center for Informatics, Czech Technical University in PragueTaif UniversityMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
KeywordsMobile edge computingMathematical optimizationComputer scienceFuzzy logicEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionRelation (database)Domain (mathematical analysis)Genetic algorithmNorm (philosophy)Field (mathematics)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging commucation technologies, such as mobile edge computing (MEC), Internet of Things (IoT), and fifth-generation (5G) broadband cellular networks, have recently drawn a great deal of interest. Therefore, numerous multiobjective optimization problems (MOOP) associated with the aforementioned technologies have arisen, for example, energy consumption, cost-effective edge user allocation (EUA), and efficient scheduling. Accordingly, the formularization of these problems through fuzzy relation equations (FRE) should be taken into consideration as a capable approach to achieving an optimized solution. In this paper, a modified technique based on a genetic algorithm (GA) to solve MOOPs, which are formulated by fuzzy relation constraints with <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>s</a:mi> </a:math> -norm, is proposed. In this method, firstly, some techniques are utilized to reduce the size of the problem, so that the reduced problem can be solved easily. The proposed GA-based technique is then applied to solve the reduced problem locally. The most important advantage of this method is to solve a wide variety of MOOPs in the field of IoT, EC, and 5G. Furthermore, some numerical experiments are conducted to show the capability of the proposed technique. Not only does this method overcome the weaknesses of conventional methods owing to its potentials in the nonconvex feasible domain, but it also is useful to model complex systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it