MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210688496 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.273

P-333 Using CANJEM to examine the association between occupational exposure to selected metals, metalloids, and welding fumes and brain cancer in the INTEROCC pooled international case-control study

2021· article· en· W3210688496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioBrain cancerGliomaMeningiomaCancerInternal medicineSurgeryCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Exposure to metallic compounds may contribute to the etiology of brain cancer; however, few epidemiologic studies have examined this potential association. <h3>Objective</h3> To examine occupational exposure to 21 metallic compounds in relation to the risk of glioma and meningioma. <h3>Methods</h3> INTEROCC is an international consortium of seven brain cancer case-control studies using a common protocol. Among 1,917 glioma cases, 1,827 meningioma cases, and 5,475 controls in the pooled INTEROCC population, job histories were collected and transformed into histories of exposure to 21 metallic compounds by linkage to the Canadian job-exposure-matrix. Three metrics of exposure were calculated for each agent: ever exposed, duration of exposure, and cumulative exposure. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for the association between the three metrics of exposure and both glioma and meningioma. <h3>Results</h3> There was no evidence of associations between our selected agents and glioma. There were positive associations, with ORs ranging from 1.20 to 2.40, between meningioma and several of the metallic compounds, most notably zinc compounds, lead fumes, chromium VI compounds, soldering fumes, metal oxide fumes, and soldering fumes. Overall, our results were similar to two previous studies based on INTEROCC that examined five of the metallic compounds included in this study, using a modified version of the Finish job-exposure-matrix. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our results are suggestive of positive associations between exposure to metallic compounds, particularly metallic fumes, and meningioma, but not glioma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it