MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nondestructive Assessment of Elastomeric Bridge Bearings Using 3D Digital Image Correlation

2021· article· en· W3210793665 on OpenAlexaff
Saleh Ahmadi Soleimani, Dimitrios Konstantinidis, Georgios P. Balomenos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital image correlationStructural engineeringNondestructive testingBearing (navigation)Finite element methodDeformation (meteorology)ElastomerNatural rubberMaterials scienceBridge (graph theory)EngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elastomeric bridge bearings are installed between the bridge superstructure and substructure to accommodate translational and rotational deformations. The manufacturing quality of elastomeric bridge bearings is of high significance because manufacturing defects (such as variations in rubber layer thickness and nonparallel steel laminates) may jeopardize their short- and long-term structural behavior and integrity. Current quality control procedures involve destructive testing of samples of bearings from a lot. This type of testing is time consuming and costly, and thus limited to a relatively small sample size, which may undermine confidence in the quality of remaining bearings in the lot. This paper presents an alternative, vision-based assessment methodology for the nondestructive identification of the internal structure of elastomeric bridge bearings. The methodology capitalizes on the high deformability of rubber and the near inextensibility of the steel laminates, which together result in a unique deformation pattern on the vertical surfaces of a bearing when it is subjected to axial load. This deformation pattern features local extrema in in-plane strain and horizontal displacement fields on the vertical surfaces. These local extrema are analyzed to deduce the thicknesses of the rubber layers and rubber side covers. The methodology is developed based on three-dimensional finite-element analyses (3D-FEA). Then, three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) is used in experimental tests to evaluate its capability to identify manufacturing defects in elastomeric bridge bearings. Finally, the methodology is validated against destructive tests. The nondestructive method presented in this study is conducted in conjunction with compressive tests that departments of transportation carry out routinely and is therefore expected to facilitate rapid and cost-effective qualification of elastomeric bridge bearings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Structural EngineeringSame topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207