MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nondestructive Assessment of Elastomeric Bridge Bearings Using 3D Digital Image Correlation

2021· article· en· W3210793665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital image correlationStructural engineeringNondestructive testingBearing (navigation)Finite element methodDeformation (meteorology)ElastomerNatural rubberMaterials scienceBridge (graph theory)EngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elastomeric bridge bearings are installed between the bridge superstructure and substructure to accommodate translational and rotational deformations. The manufacturing quality of elastomeric bridge bearings is of high significance because manufacturing defects (such as variations in rubber layer thickness and nonparallel steel laminates) may jeopardize their short- and long-term structural behavior and integrity. Current quality control procedures involve destructive testing of samples of bearings from a lot. This type of testing is time consuming and costly, and thus limited to a relatively small sample size, which may undermine confidence in the quality of remaining bearings in the lot. This paper presents an alternative, vision-based assessment methodology for the nondestructive identification of the internal structure of elastomeric bridge bearings. The methodology capitalizes on the high deformability of rubber and the near inextensibility of the steel laminates, which together result in a unique deformation pattern on the vertical surfaces of a bearing when it is subjected to axial load. This deformation pattern features local extrema in in-plane strain and horizontal displacement fields on the vertical surfaces. These local extrema are analyzed to deduce the thicknesses of the rubber layers and rubber side covers. The methodology is developed based on three-dimensional finite-element analyses (3D-FEA). Then, three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) is used in experimental tests to evaluate its capability to identify manufacturing defects in elastomeric bridge bearings. Finally, the methodology is validated against destructive tests. The nondestructive method presented in this study is conducted in conjunction with compressive tests that departments of transportation carry out routinely and is therefore expected to facilitate rapid and cost-effective qualification of elastomeric bridge bearings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it