MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210854080 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3110196

Toward Safer Navigation of Heterogeneous Mobile Robots in Distributed Scheme: A Novel Time-to-Collision-Based Method

2021· article· en· W3210854080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)University of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKinematicsCollisionRobotComputer scienceInertiaCollision avoidanceMobile robotController (irrigation)Motion (physics)Work (physics)Scheme (mathematics)SAFERSimulationControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For safe and efficient navigation of heterogeneous multiple mobile robots (HMRs), it is essential to incorporate dynamics (mass and inertia) in motion control algorithms. Many methods rely only on kinematics or point-mass models, resulting in conservative results or occasionally failure. This is especially true for robots with different masses. In this article, we develop a novel navigation methodology for a distributed scheme by incorporating the robots' dynamics through calculating the time to collision (TTC) and designing a new controller accordingly that avoids collisions. We first propose a new predictive collision term by TTC that will be used to quantify imminent collisions among HMRs. Subsequently, using this term, we develop a novel nonlinear controller that explicitly incorporates TTC in the design and guarantees collision-free motion. Simulations and experiments were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed methods. We first compared the results of our proposed approach with controllers that only consider the robots' kinematics. It was shown that the proposed control strategy (a TTC-based controller) proves to be less conservative when determining safe motions. Specifically, for environments with limited space, it was demonstrated that using robots' kinematics may result in a collision, while our strategy results in safe motion. We also performed experiments that proved collision-free navigation of HMRs with this approach. The outcomes of this work provide more reliable motion control for HMRs, especially when the robots' masses or inertias are significantly different, for example, warehouses. The developments in this work are also applicable to vehicles and can therefore be beneficial in automated collision avoidance in autonomous driving and intelligent transportation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it