Fault-Tolerance of Binarized and Stochastic Computing-based Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both binarized and stochastic computing-based neural networks exploit bit-wise operations to replace expensive full-precision multiplications with simple XNOR gates and thus, offer low-cost hardware implementation. In stochastic computing, arithmetic computations are performed on sequences of random bits which can approximate any real values. Stochastic computing-based neural networks benefit from approximate computing and promote fault-tolerant architectures against soft errors in noisy environments. On the other hand, in binarized neural networks, real values are deterministically binarized using the sign function. As a result, any bit-flip in the binarized values dramatically changes the outcome of arithmetic computations and makes binarized neural networks more vulnerable against soft errors. In this paper, we compare these two neural networks against each other in terms of fault-tolerance and hardware complexity (i.e., area and energy efficiency).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it