MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Terminal Sliding Mode Control for the Formation of a Team of Quadrotors and Mobile Robots

2021· article· en· W3211537996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal sliding modeTerminal (telecommunication)Mobile robotControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Sliding mode controlComputer scienceRobotMode (computer interface)Scheme (mathematics)Control engineeringStability (learning theory)Control (management)Topology (electrical circuits)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer networkNonlinear systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a fast terminal sliding mode control (SMC) method for the formation of heterogeneous multi-agent systems (MASs) with a fixed topology using a virtual leader. The MAS consists of quadrotors and two-wheeled mobile robots (2WMRs). Fast terminal SMC is used as a means of directing the agents in order to achieve consensus and formation in a two-dimensional environment. The stability analysis with the resultant system shows that the system is stable given an arbitrary number of agents. Simulation results are shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme for a team of three unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and three unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) in cases with and without disturbances. Experimental results are also provided to help validate the formation controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207