MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1303 The new EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria: a predictor of long-term outcomes

2021· article· en· W3211697562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Human Genome Research Institute
KeywordsMedicineConfoundingInternal medicineProportional hazards modelDiseaseCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> We recently demonstrated that a EULAR/ACR classification Criteria score ≥ 20 predicts a higher disease activity throughout the first 5 years after diagnosis. Given that disease activity is associated with damage accrual and mortality, we aimed to determine the ability of a EULAR/ACR score ≥20 to predict these long-term outcomes. <h3>Methods</h3> Inception SLE patients recruited in the first 12 months after diagnosis were included. For each patient a EULAR/ACR score was calculated based on the baseline clinical and laboratory information. The baseline information was obtained from the first 2 visits. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on their EULAR/ACR score &lt;20 or ≥20. In order to determine the ability of a EULAR/ACR ≥20 to predict damage accrual and mortality the following outcomes were assessed: Time to first damage accrued: Defined as the first increase in SLICC/ACR Damage Index from 0 to ≥ 1 within the first 10 years after SLE diagnosis, with death as a competing risk. 57 patients with damage at entry were excluded Time to first increase in damage: Defined as any increase in the SLICC/ACR Damage Index within the first 10 years after SLE diagnosis, with death as a competing risk. Mean SDI score at the 10th year of follow–up. Time to death within the first 10 years after SLE diagnosis Multivariable Cox Proportional regression was performed to calculate the risk and possible confounders. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 867 inception patients were included. Table 1 shows baseline clinical characteristics of the cohort. The proportion of patients who accrued damage within the first 10 years and the mean SDI at 10 years were significantly higher in the group of ≥ 20. When looking at the specific domains in SDI, the group with a score ≥ 20 at 10 years of follow-up had significantly more renal damage and a higher percentage of diabetes (table 2). On multivariable regression analysis, after adjusting for age and ethnicity, a score ≥ 20 continued to significantly predict damage accrual, HR 1.28 (1.04-1.57), p=0.02. When we excluded patients who had damage at enrollment the results were similar (table 3). Sixty-eight (7.8%) of patients died within the first 10 years of follow-up, the percent of deaths was higher in the group with a score ≥ 20, (table 2). Individuals in the ≥ 20 group had twice the probability of dying compared to patients with the lower score, the hazard ratios with significant p values confirmed this finding (table 3). <h3>Conclusion</h3> A EULAR/ACR score ≥20 is an indicator of damage accrual and mortality in SLE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it