Debugging of Performance Degradation in Distributed Requests Handling Using Multilevel Trace Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Root cause identification of performance degradation within distributed systems is often a difficult and time‐consuming task, yet it is crucial for maintaining high performance. In this paper, we present an execution trace‐driven solution that reduces the efforts required to investigate, debug, and solve performance problems found in multinode distributed systems. The proposed approach employs a unified analysis method to represent trace data collected from the user‐space level to the hardware level of involved nodes, allowing for efficient and effective root cause analysis. This solution works by extracting performance metrics and state information from trace data collected at user‐space, kernel, and network levels. The multisource trace data is then synchronized and structured in a multidimensional data store, which is designed specifically for this kind of data. A posteriori analysis using a top‐down approach is then used to investigate performance problems and detect their root causes. In this paper, we apply this generic framework to analyze trace data collected from the execution of the web server, database server, and application servers in a distributed LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP) Stack. Using industrial level use cases, we show that the proposed approach is capable of investigating the root cause of performance issues, addressing unusual latency, and improving base latency by 70%. This is achieved with minimal tracing overhead that does not significantly impact performance, as well as O(log n) query response times for efficient analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".