The Polysemy Of Anti-Discrimination Law: The Interpretation Architecture Of The Framework Employment Directive At The Court Of Justice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a new explanatory framework to understand the transversal developments that have emerged from the recent case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on the Framework Employment Directive. It argues that the Court operates a functional differentiation in the implementation of anti-discrimination norms, which gives rise to a complex interpretation architecture. Following the constitutionalization of EU equality law, the Court reads three main functions into the Framework Employment Directive: socialization, integrity, and calibration. This differentiation gives rise to competing interpretive paradigms and analytical templates that affect the level and shape of equality protection under the Directive. Directive 2000/78/EC, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Equality, Discrimination, non-discrimination, Functional differentiation, Socialization, Integrity, Calibration, Competing interpretive paradigms, Framework Employment Directive
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it