MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214371008 · doi:10.1086/ahr/107.5.1625

Simon R. Doubleday. <i>The Lara Family: Crown and Nobility in Medieval Spain</i>. (Harvard Historical Studies, number 141.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2001. Pp. x, 198. $45.00

2002· article· en· W3214371008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Iberian Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNobilityHistoryClassicsPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simon R. Doubleday. The Lara Family: Crown and Nobility in Medieval Spain. (Harvard Historical Studies, number 141.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2001. Pp. x, 198. $45.00 Doubleday Simon R.. The Lara Family: Crown and Nobility in Medieval Spain. (Harvard Historical Studies, number 141.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2001. Pp. x, 198. $45.00. J. N. Hillgarth J. N. Hillgarth Emeritus University of Toronto Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Historical Review, Volume 107, Issue 5, December 2002, Page 1625, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/107.5.1625 Published: 01 December 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it