¿«En nombre del pueblo»? Circulaciones del «populismo» y representaciones de lo popular en Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los usos academicos y mediaticos de la nocion de «populismo» aparecieron a principios del decenio de 2000 en Quebec, dos decadas mas tarde que en Francia. Los autores que utilizan esta nocion para analizar la escena electoral quebequense navegan entre las referencias francesas y norteamericanas, pero describen un «pueblo» con propiedades sociales muy distintas de los grupos sociales a los que se dirige este termino en Francia. La comprension de las dinamicas de circulacion, traduccion y recepcion de la nocion de «populismo» en Quebec exige que se examinen simultaneamente las trayectorias de los intelectuales que participan en esos procesos y las especificidades de ese contexto de enunciacion. La menor importancia de la sociologia politica de los grupos sociales en Quebec influye, entre otras cosas, en como lo popular queda (auto)representado mediante esta categoria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".