MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214912685 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00974

Quantum Simulation of Molecules in Solution

2022· article· en· W3214912685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsXanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada)
FundersDipartimenti di Eccellenza
KeywordsSolvationQuantumQuantum chemistryQuantum computerStatistical physicsImplicit solvationMoleculeQubitQuantum mechanicsPolarizable continuum modelAtomic orbitalONIOMPhysicsChemistryComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum chemical calculations on quantum computers have been focused mostly on simulating molecules in the gas phase. Molecules in liquid solution are, however, most relevant for chemistry. Continuum solvation models represent a good compromise between computational affordability and accuracy in describing solvation effects within a quantum chemical description of solute molecules. In this work, we extend the variational quantum eigensolver to simulate solvated systems using the polarizable continuum model. To account for the state dependent solute-solvent interaction we generalize the variational quantum eigensolver algorithm to treat non-linear molecular Hamiltonians. We show that including solvation effects does not impact the algorithmic efficiency. Numerical results of noiseless simulations for molecular systems with up to 12 spin-orbitals (qubits) are presented. Furthermore, calculations performed on a simulated noisy quantum hardware (IBM Q, Mumbai) yield computed solvation free energies in fair agreement with the classical calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it