MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215024008 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2021.3130979

Artificial Noise Aided Secure Communications for Cooperative NOMA Networks

2021· article· en· W3215024008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceNomaRelayComputer networkEavesdroppingBeamformingSingle antenna interference cancellationArtificial noiseDecoding methodsTelecommunications linkWirelessWireless networkSpectral efficiencyPhysical layerTelecommunicationsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has been envisioned as a promising multiple access technique to improve spectral efficiency and provide massive connectivity in future wireless networks. However, the inherited security issues with NOMA should be carefully addressed to further exploit its potential benefits in NOMA enabled wireless networks. As such, we consider a cooperative NOMA network, where a source uses the NOMA to simultaneously communicate with a multi-antenna near-user and a far-user. While directly communicating with the near-user, the source employs multiple full-duplex (FD) decode-and forward (DF) relays to establish communication with the far-user in the presence of a passive eavesdropper. To address the eavesdropping in this cooperative NOMA network, we propose a new two-phase FD-based artificial noise (AN) scheme with different relay selection techniques. In the first phase, the selected FD relay emits AN to confuse the eavesdropper while receiving the superimposed signal from the source. In the second phase, the selected relay performs exclusive OR (XOR) operation on both the message intended to the far-user and the AN before broadcasting the resulting mixed signal. By utilizing null-space beamforming, self-interference cancellation techniques and DF-XOR cooperative protocol, the AN in the proposed scheme can be efficiently eliminated at the near-user and far-user as well as at the selected relay. However, the AN cannot be suppressed at the eavesdropper which serves the purpose of AN through degrading the decoding capability of the eavesdropper. We evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme in terms of security-reliability trade-off (SRT). For the AN-aided scheme with max-min and partial relay selection techniques, we theoretically derive the exact and asymptotic closed-form expressions of the outage probability and intercept probability. Numerical results have been provided to validate the derivations. In addition, the results reveal that the SRT of the near-user and far-user can be improved by increasing the number of antennas at the near-user and the number of relays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it