MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215393605 · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3128411

Path Planning of Arbitrary Shaped Mobile Robots With Safety Consideration

2021· article· en· W3215393605 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMobile robotMotion planningRobotComputer sciencePath (computing)EngineeringSimulationControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a neural network-based approach for the path planning of arbitrary shaped mobile robots in complex environments, with the consideration of safety. A 2D workspace is discretized to a topologically organized map using a biological neural network, in which the dynamic neural activity landscape represents the environmental information. A set of kernel matrices are established to describe the shape and orientation features of the robot. Taking the safety factor into consideration, the translation and rotation performances of the robot on each neuron node of the workspace are determined using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Then, from the initial state of the robot to the target state, a node rooted tree is constructed by searching the adjacent neurons, and the moving path of the robot is generated by backward searching the node rooted tree. By changing the bias coefficient in the convolutional calculation, the clearance between the planned path and the obstacles can be conveniently adjusted. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through several simulations conducted in both static and dynamic environments. The results show that the method can effectively solve the “path blocked” issue caused by small densely scattered obstacles, and also solve the “too close” and “too far” path planning problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it