How much do process parameters affect the residual quality attributes of dried fruits and vegetables for convective drying?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drying processes reduce the amount of available essential nutrients in dried plant-based foods to a large extent compared to fresh produce. This reduction is much larger than the differences in the final quality of products dried using various processing parameters and, in most cases, different drying methods. This aspect is, however, rarely highlighted. Here, the extent to which different convective drying methods reduce the nutritional content, namely vitamin C, carotenoids and phenolic content of dried fruits and vegetables, compared to fresh produce was quantified using literature data. The impact of different drying process parameters, such as air temperature, airspeed and relative humidity on the nutritional content of fruits and vegetables were compared. Results revealed that convective drying reduced the amount of vitamin C, carotenoids and the phenolic content of dried fruits and vegetables by up to 70%. The reduction in the residual vitamin C and carotenoid content of dried fruits and vegetables due to differences in air temperature (∼40%), airspeed (∼20%), and relative humidity (∼20%) is much less than the nutritional quality losses due to the drying process. The residual vitamin C, carotenoids and phenolic contents in convective-dried fruits and vegetables are ∼30% less than those in freeze-dried products. This study confirms that little absolute gains in nutritional quality can be achieved by opting for either an alternative drying method or optimizing processing parameters since the drying process already results in a low nutritional quality of dried products. As such, the remaining micronutrient concentration of dried products should not necessarily be a decisive criterion in selecting the most appropriate drying method or processing parameters for fruits and vegetables. Instead, other key performance indicators such as the drying time, energy consumption, or sensory properties such as color, texture, and rehydration capacity could eventually have a greater influence on the decision-making process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it