Online Partial Offloading and Task Scheduling in SDN-Fog Networks With Deep Recurrent Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart industries enabling automation and data exchange in manufacturing technologies demanding real-time processing, nearby storage, and reliability, all of which can be satisfied by the fog computing architecture. With the emergence of smart devices coupled with a diverse range of application requirements, it is essential to have an intelligent fog network where intelligence is spread across all network segments, taking network nodes self-aware and self-decision making. In fog networks, an optimal distribution decision faces challenges due to uncertainties associated with user workload and available resources at the fog nodes and also the wide range of node’s computing power. Given this challenge, a computational offloading and CPU resource scheduling method for minimizing energy consumption is proposed. To investigate the characteristics for offloading and optimizing their allocation, we consider two types of tasks, namely, offloadable and nonoffloadable tasks. The independent fog nodes adopt the same strategy without prior knowledge of the dynamic statistics and global observations, aiming to maximize a common goal with cooperative behaviors. Then, the deep recurrent$Q$-network (DRQN) is applied to deal with the partial-observability from limited information. The proposed DRQN-based method requires comparatively less computational complexity than the conventional$Q$-learning algorithm. The simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively deal with both transmission and CPU energy consumptions while guaranteeing convergence in a limited time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".