MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216315701 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-ioc.278

303 Injury burden and characteristics in aesthetic sports among high school adolescents

2021· article· en· W3216315701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesPhysical therapyDanceMedicineInjury preventionPoison controlPsychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Aesthetic sports require athletes to showcase extreme flexibility, aerial maneuvers and perform hard surface landings that may increase injury risk. However, very few studies have examined injury risk in this population. <h3>Objectives</h3> To identify aesthetic sport injury prevalence among high school students and to describe the type, location and severity of injury in adolescents who practice aesthetic sports. <h3>Design</h3> Cross-sectional study. <h3>Setting</h3> High schools in Calgary area, Canada. <h3>Participants</h3> Adolescent students (n=2029; 958 male, 1048 female, 23 identified ‘other’; ages 14–19 year) from 24 high schools. <h3>Assessment of Risk Factors</h3> Self-reported participation in aesthetic sport (i.e., gymnastics, dance, figure skating) in previous one-year (based on top three sports for participation). <h3>Main Outcome Measurements</h3> Self-reported injury (time loss/medical attention), type, anatomical location, and severity. Proportions [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were adjusted for cluster by school. <h3>Results</h3> Among the 2029 students who completed the question about sport participation, 15% (302/2029) participated in aesthetic sports (282 female, 20 males; dance (247/302; 82%), gymnastics (50/302; 16%), figure skating (22/302; 7%). In the previous one-year, 74 females (26.2%; 95% CI, 20.8–32.6) and 2 males (10.0%; 95% CI, 2.6–31.2) listed aesthetic sport injury as the most severe. Ankle (26.3%; 95% CI, 17.5–37.6), knee (25.0%; 95% CI, 16.4–36.2), and back (9.2%; 95% CI 4.4–18.4) were the most common injury sites. Ligament sprains (22.7%; 95% CI 14.4–33.7), muscle strains (14.7%; 95%CI 8.2–24.9), and fractured bones (12.0%; 95% CI 6.3–21.8) were most common injury types. Medical attention injury rate was 20.5/100 athletes/year and time-loss &gt;7 days injury rate was 11.9/100 athletes/year. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Aesthetic sport participation and injury rates among high school students are high. The most serious injuries reported were lower extremity injuries with a greater proportion of females reporting aesthetic sport injuries than males. Future research should focus on mitigation of lower extremity injuries among these high-risk aesthetic athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it