MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216722039 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00040

Percutaneous Forefoot Decompression in a Foot Compartment Syndrome Model

2021· article· en· W3216722039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Open Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentrePolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompartment (ship)PercutaneousForefootCompartment SyndromesDecompressionFoot (prosody)Surgical decompression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute compartment syndrome of the foot is a controversial topic. Release of the foot has been seen as complicated because of large incisions and postoperative morbidity, and there has been debate over whether this procedure is actually effective for releasing all areas of increased pressure. New sensor technology affords the opportunity to advance our understanding of acute compartment syndrome of the foot and its treatment. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether percutaneous decompression could be performed for the treatment of compartment syndrome in a forefoot model. METHODS: The present study utilized a validated continuous pressure sensor to model compartment syndrome in human cadaveric feet. We utilized a pressure-controlled saline solution infusion system to induce increased pressure. A novel percutaneous release of the forefoot was investigated to assess its efficacy in achieving decompression. RESULTS: For all cadaveric specimens, continuous pressure monitoring was accomplished with use of a continuous pressure sensor. There were 4 discrete compartment areas that could be reliably pressurized in all feet. The average baseline, pressurized, and post-release pressures (and standard deviations) were 4.5 ± 2.9, 43.8 ± 7.7, and 9.5 ± 3.6 mm Hg, respectively. Percutaneous decompression produced a significant decrease in pressure in all 4 compartments (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With use of continuous compartment pressure monitoring, 4 consistent areas were established as discrete compartments in the foot. All 4 compartments were pressurized with a standard pump system. With use of 2 small dorsal incisions, all 4 compartments were successfully released, with no injuries identified in the cutaneous nerve branches, extensor tendons, or arteries. These results have strong implications for the future of modeling compartment syndrome as well as for guiding clinical studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A reproducible and accurate method of continuous pressure monitoring of foot compartments after trauma is needed (1) to reliably identify patients who are likely to benefit from compartment release and (2) to help avoid missed or evolving cases of acute compartment syndrome. In addition, a reproducible method for percutaneous compartment release that minimizes collateral structural damage and the need for secondary surgical procedures is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it