MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216830815

A Diachronic Perspective on the Materiality of Fur Trade Beads and Beading

2021· article· en· W3216830815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMateriality (auditing)IndigenousFur tradeBeadAssemblage (archaeology)Identity (music)ArchaeologyHistoryAnthropologyEthnologySociologyEconomic historyArtAestheticsEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glass trade beads were common items of the historical North American fur trade.  This paper focuses on better contextualizing glass beads in trade, in fur trade society, and to fur trade archaeology, using a small assemblage excavated from a Nadleh Whut’en house near to Fort Fraser, British Columbia.  While beads were not essential to the physical survival of their Indigenous recipients, they were useful to the European traders in establishing reciprocal relationships vital to their success and survival.  In fur trade society, glass trade beads were items of materiality that came to be entangled with events, experiences and Indigenous women’s identity. They may thus be useful for further understanding Indigenous women who were excluded from primary historical documents. Department: Anthropology Faculty Mentor: Dr. Paul Prince

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it