MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contraceptive method preference and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation among women randomized to intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device or a levonorgestrel implant: Findings from Durban, South Africa

2021· article· en· W3217445633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContraception · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouth African Medical Research CouncilUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentUnited Nations Population FundMount Royal UniversityStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone acetateRandomized controlled trialGynecologyLong-acting reversible contraceptionFamily planningContraceptive implantPopulationObstetricsIntrauterine deviceRandomizationSurgeryInternal medicineResearch methodologyEstrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants in South Africa is low with limited data on patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation. We describe contraceptive preferences and reasons for discontinuation among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial from one trial site. STUDY DESIGN: ECHO, conducted between 2015 and 2018, enrolled and randomized sexually active women, aged 16 to 35, and desiring contraception, to intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (copper-IUD) or a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant; follow-up was 12 to 18 months. We interviewed 829 women at the Durban, South Africa trial site at ECHO Trial exit to ascertain contraceptive preferences at randomization. Reasons for randomized contraceptive discontinuation were collected at ECHO Trial exit and 6 months later. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: At the final ECHO Trial visit, among women using their randomized contraceptive method (n = 757), 21% discontinued DMPA-IM, 20% discontinued LNG implant and 22% discontinued the copper-IUD. About a quarter from each group discontinued due to problems with bleeding. Among women continuing their randomized contraceptive at trial exit (n = 597), 25% discontinued DMPA-IM within 6 months of exiting the study, 8% discontinued LNG implant and 4% discontinued copper-IUD. A third of women reported wanting to be assigned DMPA-IM at randomization, 20% wanted the LNG implant and 18% the copper-IUD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some women having preferences about which contraceptive they might be randomized to, discontinuation rates for all three methods at ECHO Trial exit and 6-month post-trial follow-up were low. IMPLICATIONS: Despite limited prior use of IUDs and implants among women enrolled in this study, and a desire by some women to not receive these methods at randomization, discontinuation rates remained low. The provision of quality contraceptive counselling and support may increase uptake and continued use of implants and IUDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it