Contraceptive method preference and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation among women randomized to intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device or a levonorgestrel implant: Findings from Durban, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants in South Africa is low with limited data on patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation. We describe contraceptive preferences and reasons for discontinuation among women enrolled in the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial from one trial site. STUDY DESIGN: ECHO, conducted between 2015 and 2018, enrolled and randomized sexually active women, aged 16 to 35, and desiring contraception, to intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (copper-IUD) or a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant; follow-up was 12 to 18 months. We interviewed 829 women at the Durban, South Africa trial site at ECHO Trial exit to ascertain contraceptive preferences at randomization. Reasons for randomized contraceptive discontinuation were collected at ECHO Trial exit and 6 months later. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: At the final ECHO Trial visit, among women using their randomized contraceptive method (n = 757), 21% discontinued DMPA-IM, 20% discontinued LNG implant and 22% discontinued the copper-IUD. About a quarter from each group discontinued due to problems with bleeding. Among women continuing their randomized contraceptive at trial exit (n = 597), 25% discontinued DMPA-IM within 6 months of exiting the study, 8% discontinued LNG implant and 4% discontinued copper-IUD. A third of women reported wanting to be assigned DMPA-IM at randomization, 20% wanted the LNG implant and 18% the copper-IUD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some women having preferences about which contraceptive they might be randomized to, discontinuation rates for all three methods at ECHO Trial exit and 6-month post-trial follow-up were low. IMPLICATIONS: Despite limited prior use of IUDs and implants among women enrolled in this study, and a desire by some women to not receive these methods at randomization, discontinuation rates remained low. The provision of quality contraceptive counselling and support may increase uptake and continued use of implants and IUDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".