MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217600905 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-ioc.391

427 Applying bayesian networks to injury occurrence in professional football

2021· article· en· W3217600905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFootballBayesian networkLeagueComputer scienceBayesian probabilityOutcome (game theory)StatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Bayesian networks (BN) are directed acyclic graphs derived from empirical data that describe the dependency and probability structure. It may facilitate understanding of complex epidemiology by presenting the data in a multi-dimensional visual representation, and guiding inferences on the likelihood of the severity based on new information. <h3>Objective</h3> To provide a brief overview of BN and demonstrate its utility on a practical example of making inferences on days of absence when hypothetically new information was introduced. <h3>Design</h3> Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected injury data. <h3>Participants</h3> All male football players who were playing in the highest German professional league (Bundesliga) from 2014/15 to 2019/20 seasons were included. Players were identified from a publicly available database. <h3>Data analysis</h3> A BN structure was inferred using GeNIe 2.0. A search and score algorithm and existing empirical evidence knowledge were used to identify the structure. The variables included were age, height, weight, main position, part of the season, event, injury type, the injured body part, days of absence. The parameters were calculated with the expectation-maximization algorithm. <h3>Main Outcome Measurements</h3> Injury severity based on days of absence (mild: &lt;4, minimal &gt;4–7, moderate &gt;7–28, severe &gt;28). <h3>Results</h3> 3,030 player seasons were registered over the six seasons (age: 25.5±4.0, height (cm): 183.3±6.4 and weight (kg): 78.3±6.8), with 5,883 time-loss injuries. A network structure with distribution probability was built. A hypothetical scenario is used to illustrate how a BN makes inferences regarding injury severity. Case 1, a defender, 20 years old, suffered from a groin muscle injury. Case 2, a defender, 27 years old, suffered from a thigh muscle injury. Based on the BN constructed, we can infer the likelihood of the injury severity and the result is shown in Table 1. The result is based on the Bundesliga dataset and is specific to the study population. Counterfactual analysis may be used to inform coaches and clinicians about the likelihood of severity of an injury based on the features of the injury, for example, the characteristics of the player and the game. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The BN may offer an enhanced insight into the complex epidemiological systems and guide inferences on injury severity based on new information. This may potentially help clinicians in creating hypothetical scenarios on the severity and facilitate shared decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it