MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W32205154

Visualizing and Inspecting Bayesian Belief Models

2001· article· en· W32205154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian networkVisualizationComputer scienceBayesian probabilityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningReflection (computer programming)Data visualizationBayesian inferenceRepresentation (politics)Graphical modelHuman–computer interactionData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) have become accepted and used widely to model uncertain reasoning and causal relationships. We have developed an interactive visualization tool (VisNet) that allows students and/or teachers to inspect BBNs. Using VisNet it is possible to experiment with concepts such as marginal probability, changes in probability, probability propagation and cause-effect relationships in BBNs using visualization techniques. ViSMod (Visualization of Bayesian Student Models), an extended version of VisNet, opens the internal representation of the student’s knowledge to teachers and/or students interested in knowing more about the knowledge about them represented in the system. Both VisNet and ViSMod aim to support reflection processes in learning environments that rely on the use of Bayesian models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207