MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W330276444

(In) Habitation: Musical Settings of Margaret Atwood Poetry by American Women Composers

2011· article· en· W330276444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Singing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryMusicalPianoArtLiteratureLyricsVisual artsArt historyChoirHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(In) Habitation: Musical Settings of Margaret Atwood Poetry by American Women Composers. Eileen Strempel, soprano; Sylvie Beaudette, piano. (Centaur CRC 3002; 63:29). Judith Cloud: Dreams: Night Poem, Siren Song, Variations on the Word Sleep, Flying Inside Your Own Body. Elisenda Fabregas: Moments of Change: Moment, Habitation, More and More, is Dangerous to Read Newspapers, Late Night. Lori Laitman: Orange Afternoon Lover: Against Still Life, I Was Reading a Scientific Journal, I Am Sitting On the Edge. Tania Leon: Atwood Songs: Notes Towards a Poem That Can Never be Written, Memory, Eating Fire, Habitation, Four Evasions. Amanda Harberg: Memory (Midnight Songs). Libby Larsen: Take. This recording represents one of the most auspicious art song projects of the new century, and one would never guess that it began under such simple and even sweet circumstances. In 2004, Canadian novelist and poet Margaret Atwood was invited to Syracuse University at the invitation of a selection committee that included Eileen Strempel, an associate professor of art and music there and an active soprano highly regarded as an interpreter of modern art song. In anticipation of the award-winning writer's visit, Strempel read a great deal of Atwood's work and sought out whatever musical settings of her texts she could find. Regrettably, there turned out to be startlingly few of them, which inspired Strempel to pursue what ultimately became known as the Atwood Project. With the writer's enthusiastic blessing, six composers were commissioned to set texts of their own choosing to music. In part to commemorate the thirtieth anniversary of the National Women's History Project, all six composers approached for the project were women: Judith Cloud, Elisenda Fabregas, Amanda Harberg, Lori Laitman, Libby Larsen, and Tania Leon. Three years later, Eileen Strempel and her long-time collaborator Sylvie Beaudette premiered these nineteen songs in what had to have been an evening of remarkable excitement, with Ms. Atwood and four of the six composers in attendance. Needless to say, most of us were not there, but this recording is an attempt to convey what it would have felt like to be in the audience that night to hear these striking songs unveiled for the very first time. Margaret Atwood's work has garnered widespread acclaim for its bold, incisive exploration of the human experience, the rich vividness of her verbal palette, and the restless inventiveness of her craftsmanship. Still, it is probably not an accident that her texts have found rather limited musical life, for they are likely to be as intimidating as they are inspiring to would-be composers. Her poems tend not to flow sweetly and predictably, and many of them are so potent on their own that one has to wonder whether setting them to music can be anything but a distraction from or a reduction in their impact. It is a tribute to these six composers that they undertook the challenge and managed to create unfailingly compelling songs. The liner notes begin with a quote from Carol Kimball, one of the country's most esteemed authorities on art song (and a regular contributor to Journal of Singing), in which she says that one mark of a fine art song is that the listener finds it all but impossible to think of the music and text as separate ingredients that have been combined, but rather will take them in as a seamless whole and an utterly new creation. One might think of this as the Wagnerian concept of Gesamtkunstwerk (all-encompassing artwork), but on a much more intimate scale. And yet, there are songs in this recording where the relationship of music to text is more unsettled than that, and one is much more aware that this is a poem that someone has set to music. But even in these more effortfully executed songs there is much to appreciate and admire, even as they also help us appreciate the mastery of those songs where music and text are almost mystically one. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it