MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33073305 · doi:10.7939/r33x83k3f

Optimal zoning of forested land considering contribution of exotic plantations

2012· article· en· W33073305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoningForest managementLand useNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental resource managementPlan (archaeology)GeographyAgroforestryEnvironmental planningEconomicsForestryEnvironmental scienceEcologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies suggest that management intensity zoning systems,  such as the triad approach, could allow Canada's forest industry to  maintain or increase timber harvest levels while simultaneously  reducing its environmental impact.  In most such studies, the zones  are exogenously specified.  In this study, we use a linear  programming model to endogenously allocate forest land to management  intensity zones given several alternative policy scenario  formulations.  We examine how alternative policy scenarios affect  the net present value of the optimal forest management plan, timber  output, and the spatial allocation of land to management intensity  zones. We conclude that policies which facilitate optimal zoning  could enable land use specialization to increase both profits and  ecological protection.  Such zoning, however, can only happen if  provincial governments in Canada revise their forest policies with  respect to allocation of forest tenures and establishment of exotic  plantations on public forest land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it