MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W352383791

Is Christian’s Parallelized 7-Sphere Model Essential for the Physical Interpretation of M-Theory?

2012· preprint· en· W352383791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueviXra · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Mathematical economicsRealismTheoretical physicsEpistemologyMathematicsPhilosophyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1991 with Abner Shimony as thesis advisor, J. Christian obtained his PhD in the foundations of quantum theory. As of 2012, he is affiliated with both Wolfson College of the University of Oxford and the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario. From 2007 to 2012 Christian published some highly controversial work related to Bell’s theorem. Christian has proposed a parallelized 7-sphere model for a local, realistic theory that replaces quantum theory. This communication considers how his model might be relevant to a physical interpretation of M-theory. There is overwhelming empirical evidence in favor of the Ranada-Milgrom effect, at least as an approximation. Christian’s theory of local realism might be empirically valid if and only if the Ranada-Milgrom effect is empirically valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it