MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36767646 · doi:10.3390/ijerph20032282

Features and status of miniature indigenous germplasm of cattle- Malnad Gidda

2008· article· en· W36767646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Journal of Animal Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock Management and Performance Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Chongqing
KeywordsBreedBiologyGermplasmHerdVeterinary medicineCoatPopulationAnimal scienceWithersIce calvingLivestockBody weightDemographyAgronomyLactationMedicinePregnancyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the threat to human life and health from fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) increases globally, the life and health problems caused by environmental pollution are also of increasing concern. Understanding past trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and exploring the drivers of PM<sub>2.5</sub> are important tools for addressing the life-threatening health problems caused by PM<sub>2.5</sub>. In this study, we calculated the change in annual average global PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations from 2000 to 2020 using the Theil-Sen median trend analysis method and reveal spatial and temporal trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations over twenty-one years. The qualitative and quantitative effects of different drivers on PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in 2020 were explored from natural and socioeconomic perspectives using a multi-scale geographically weighted regression model. The results show that there is significant spatial heterogeneity in trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, with significant decreases in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations mainly in developed regions, such as the United States, Canada, Japan and the European Union countries, and conversely, significant increases in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in developing regions, such as Africa, the Middle East and India. In addition, in regions with more advanced science and technology and urban management, PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations are more evenly influenced by various factors, with a more negative influence. In contrast, regions at the rapid development stage usually continue their economic development at the cost of the environment, and under a high intensity of human activity. Increased temperature is known as the most important factor for the increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, while an increase in NDVI can play an important role in the reduction in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. This suggests that countries can achieve good air quality goals by setting a reasonable development path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it