MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37010459 · doi:10.1071/he07073

Maori physical activity: A review of an indigenous population's participation

2007· review· en· W37010459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Promotion Journal of Australia · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAthletic Training and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPopulation healthHealth economicsPublic healthPopulationPhysical activityGeographySocioeconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthMedicineSociologyEnvironmental healthEcologyNursingBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Indigenous populations have disparities in health along with disparities in modifiable risk factors, including low participation in physical activity. Given the importance of physical activity in moderating ill health, do all indigenous peoples exhibit low activity prevalence in concert with ill health? If an indigenous population is relatively active, what can be learned about physical activity development that has underlined this activity and could this be transferred to practice in other countries? METHODS: A review of national surveys undertaken since 1997 reporting physical activity prevalence of New Zealanders of different ethnicities, including Maori, was conducted. This was compared with prevalence data from other countries gained from searches of databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Sports Discus and government websites. Socio-economic and environmental influences were examined with a view to understanding Maori physical activity prevalence. RESULTS: The proportion of active adult Maoris, the indigenous population of New Zealand, is similar to European New Zealanders. For example, the Ministry of Health has reported that 60% and 51% of Maori males and females respectively, and 58% and 50% of European men and women respectively, undertake at least 30 minutes of physical activity on at least five days per week. These findings are at odds with other indigenous populations, with the possible exception of Canada. The prevalence of undertaking no leisure-time physical activity is 48.7% for American Indian/Alaskan Native American women compared with 30.7% of white American women; 37.2% for American Indian/Alaskan Native American older adults compared with 29.3% of white American older adults; and 12% for Maori compared with 10% for all New Zealanders. CONCLUSIONS: Despite health disparities, Maori are at least as active as European New Zealanders. The reasons for this lack of disparity in physical activity prevalence between Maori and European New Zealanders could be due to environmental influences, including those in the socio-cultural and policy environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.559
GPT teacher head0.666
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it